This concept has always caused my head to hurt. It involves an experiment where only by observation can one know the outcome. In quantum theory it is apparently called a superposition. A superposition is where something can be both things at once. In the case of the cat it is in a position of being both alive and dead at the same time!
If you want to know more go to http://www.mtnmath.com/faq/meas-qm-3.html.
What the ECJ have decided in relation to holidays and sick pay is that there is no superposition (see Mrs C. Stringer & Others v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs C -520/06). You cannot be both sick and on holiday. This means that during any period of sick leave your entitlement to holiday continues to accrue. On your return you can either take the holiday or if your employment is terminated then you are paid money in lieu.
May be not an entirely unexpected outcome bearing in mind the problems of being in two states of existence at once but certainly troubling for employers. What this would appear to mean is that someone who is unable to work may go away for a break (a frequent occurrence with someone who is recuperating after an operation) but this will not count towards their holiday.
This also raises issues as to the affordability for small firms who having had to cover for long term sickness find themselves having to pay notice pay and all untaken holiday in the form of pay to a departing employee.
Entitlement to holiday pay is meant to be about breaks and rest. So employers will I think find it somewhat surprising that people on the sick can get money in lieu of holidays even though they never return from sick leave!
Peter D
What the ECJ have decided in relation to holidays and sick pay is that there is no superposition (see Mrs C. Stringer & Others v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs C -520/06). You cannot be both sick and on holiday. This means that during any period of sick leave your entitlement to holiday continues to accrue. On your return you can either take the holiday or if your employment is terminated then you are paid money in lieu.
May be not an entirely unexpected outcome bearing in mind the problems of being in two states of existence at once but certainly troubling for employers. What this would appear to mean is that someone who is unable to work may go away for a break (a frequent occurrence with someone who is recuperating after an operation) but this will not count towards their holiday.
This also raises issues as to the affordability for small firms who having had to cover for long term sickness find themselves having to pay notice pay and all untaken holiday in the form of pay to a departing employee.
Entitlement to holiday pay is meant to be about breaks and rest. So employers will I think find it somewhat surprising that people on the sick can get money in lieu of holidays even though they never return from sick leave!
Peter D
No comments:
Post a Comment